Apocalyptic Robin Hood
At 9:30 yesterday morning, Jamie and I snuck our travel mugs of coffee into the Newton AMC to enjoy the $6 showing of Robin Hood. Jamie has been anticipating the movie for months and I found a fun outing with my husband to be a compelling reason to drag myself out of bed at 8am on a Saturday morning.
Blame it on the day job (and by job, I mean vast amounts of work for which I do not get paid), but I found myself actively contemplating my resonance with the narrative of the film. Let’s put aside that the film was poorly received by movie critics and many move-goers, that the story did not follow the traditional Robin Hood legend, that the character development did not reach the depth of which one would hope and that the final battle scene was more than a little campy (really? Slow motion?). No, what I am speaking of in terms of resonance is the war narrative. Indeed, I find this same resonance when I watch most films that position its war narrative as some sort of dualistic battle. Pick your movie: Braveheart, The Patriot, etc. And this troubles me. Why, as a Christian who strongly leans toward nonviolent resistance – and who worships the Jesus who said “blessed are the peacemakers” – is my heart stirred by this phenomenon? Why am I not repulsed by it?
Certainly, the troubling nature of this resonance can be understood by all who look to Jesus at the Prince of Peace. I found myself amazed at the ability of the war narrative to carry my emotions (WARNING: small spoiler alert ahead. But seriously, even with the legend altered, do we really not know how the story might turn out?). At the beginning of the movie, we see the English army returning on a Crusade from Jerusalem, pillaging French estates as they make their way back to England. At one point, an English archer describes the mass killing of Muslim women and children by the invading forces into the Holy Land. Yet, by the end of the movie, I find myself cheering for the English – the same English that had just marched a destructive path from Jerusalem back to England – as they defeat the invading French army. Certainly I have no stake in this war. My ancestry is neither English nor French and, even if it was, I doubt a fictional twelfth century battle in the continuous feud between France and England would conjure any sort of historical trauma. So I return to the question: why did my heart stir? Surely there were innocent foot soldiers and machiavellian kings on both sides of this battle between the French and the English. Blood guilt lay on French and English hands.
Perhaps a clue lies in Robin Hood’s obligatory stirring speech that rouses the passions of men (sorry women, there were none to be found in this scene) to fight against the invading enemy. In this speech, he declares that the home of every Englishman is his castle (apparently Robin Hood is to be credited with crafting this iconic English notion). And there it hit me. What was stirring my soul was not the war-mongering of humankind but the larger fight against the oppression in this world that precludes individuals from leading peaceful lives. It is the same reason that Charles Dickens is one of my favorite authors and why I am moved every time Frodo saves the Shire by deciding to throw the ring into the fire.
This new rendition of Robin Hood is thus a traditional use of the apocalyptic. Though not the end of the entire world, we are led to believe that it is the end of the peaceable English world if France is allowed to win. And I want peace for the characters I have come to know. Dualistic positioning emerges. The problem with this is that our world is not Middle Earth, in which we are fighting demon-like orcs. We are people beloved by God fighting people beloved by God. Imago Dei fighting Imago Dei. And while I understand that this movie is a fictional account, it leaves me wondering whether the stirred souls of movie-goers carry this apocalyptic narrative into the real world.
So I return to my question: as a worshipper of the Prince of Peace, what do I do with this stirred soul? I think the key lies in identifying exactly why my soul was stirred. My heart breaks, as I believe my God’s heart breaks, for all who are oppressed to the point that renders impossible a peaceable life. There are no sides in this scenario, humanly speaking; the oppressed are members of all nationalities, of all religions – indeed, they are any of the human race subject to the Powers that Be, the Domination Systems – what the theologian Walter Wink terms the systems of this world that perpetuate oppression and violence.
Christians, too, have a narrative in the face of the war narrative that so permeates our culture. It is the narrative that tells us to turn the other cheek, give our undergarment as well and to walk the second mile (Matt 5:39). And by so doing, we address that soul-stirring notion of rejecting oppression for a better way. Certainly in this already/not yet state this will not be fully realized until the eschaton. But as a prophetic voice to the world, the Christian narrative, in line with the radically inverse notions we find indigenous to the Kingdom of God, boldly proclaims that oppression is conquered by the Way of Peace.
“I believe that unarmed truth and unconditional love will have the final word in reality. That is why right temporarily defeated is stronger than evil triumphant.”
-Martin Luther King, Jr.
Tags:
Comments: no comments »











__________________________________________________